See also comment about the audience.
This document flirts with being a technical document, but is positioned as a basic explainer to a non-technical audience.
Two documents are needed: 1. A technical set of criteria for those familiar with the challenges of valuation and the nuances of applying valuations to a specific assessment. This document is the criteria framework and user guide. 2. A non-technical document for a wider audience to explain objectives of criteria, the process, and at a high level the types of criteria included and why. This document is about building confidence of the users of assessments.
This draft is neither one nor the other.
The definitions column is also not very helpful. Suggest a worked example would be better.
See also comment about the audience.
This document flirts with being a technical document, but is positioned as a basic explainer to a non-technical audience.
Two documents are needed: 1. A technical set of criteria for those familiar with the challenges of valuation and the nuances of applying valuations to a specific assessment. This document is the criteria framework and user guide. 2. A non-technical document for a wider audience to explain objectives of criteria, the process, and at a high level the types of criteria included and why. This document is about building confidence of the users of assessments.
This draft is neither one nor the other.
The definitions column is also not very helpful. Suggest a worked example would be better.