this is important. But is more about evidence used to substantiate the calculation. Both in terms of the change in the capital and how changes in people's wellbeing are being estimated.

The lack of clarity over how these criteria are applied within the calculation process (ie to change in capital and/or to creation of valuation coefficients) makes this point a bit confusing. Feels like this one might be more about causality of an overal assessment than the valuation coeffients themselves?