Time preferences is worded in a biased way #43

Open #43 opened by rs37cc on #16 Time preferences · 0 replies

RS
rs37cc remarked
suggest change to "....value one period (past, present, future) over another period (future, past, present); or something similar. The way it is currently worded, it suggests to value the future over the present may mean a negative value as the inverse to the extent to which the present is valued over the future.

You must sign in or register to reply to this comment.

Assignee
No one

Labels
Apply labels to this comment
None

Notifications