When judgements are made of another person, they are from the perspective of the one judging. They are inherently biased, and based on the experience of the one judging at that moment. The stakeholder groups are also constantly changing.
Over what timeline are the characteristics? What if a community of stakeholders were more tolerant of harmful behaviours to their environment by others when they were younger, and as they age, they are more vociferous in their refusal to accept the conditions? Indeed, we are seeing a shift in the value associated with the event or situation, which is a function of this project. However, what if the parties making the valuation were from the very group that were perceived as causing harm by the stakeholders? Whose valuation is it?
When judgements are made of another person, they are from the perspective of the one judging. They are inherently biased, and based on the experience of the one judging at that moment. The stakeholder groups are also constantly changing.
Over what timeline are the characteristics? What if a community of stakeholders were more tolerant of harmful behaviours to their environment by others when they were younger, and as they age, they are more vociferous in their refusal to accept the conditions? Indeed, we are seeing a shift in the value associated with the event or situation, which is a function of this project. However, what if the parties making the valuation were from the very group that were perceived as causing harm by the stakeholders? Whose valuation is it?